<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nicholas Cote  |  blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>politics and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;A paraplegic lesbian math genius&#8221; by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/184/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/184/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Snubbed:

Meryl Streep
Philip Seymour Hoffman
Mickey Rourke
Waltz With Bashir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snubbed:</p>
<p>Meryl Streep<br />
Philip Seymour Hoffman<br />
Mickey Rourke<br />
Waltz With Bashir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posting Will Resume by Nicholas Cote</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/posting-will-resume/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-58</guid>
		<description>The post also turned out not be true.  Tonight or tomorrow, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post also turned out not be true.  Tonight or tomorrow, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Posting Will Resume by Kiki</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/posting-will-resume/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=182#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just not that into this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just not that into this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood&#8217;s Cyrstal Ball by JSK</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/hollywoods-cyrstal-ball/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>JSK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-54</guid>
		<description>No, Nick, he&#039;s right. It&#039;s been empirically proven that 1932, 1980 and 2008 were the only years in our country&#039;s history where the people experienced fear and inner questioning. Shockingly, they&#039;re also the only years that everyone in our country experienced a change in mind-set. Here&#039;s where it gets weird though: if you add the numbers 1932, 1980 and 2008, and then subtract by 5007, you get: 911! How didn&#039;t we see this sooner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Nick, he&#8217;s right. It&#8217;s been empirically proven that 1932, 1980 and 2008 were the only years in our country&#8217;s history where the people experienced fear and inner questioning. Shockingly, they&#8217;re also the only years that everyone in our country experienced a change in mind-set. Here&#8217;s where it gets weird though: if you add the numbers 1932, 1980 and 2008, and then subtract by 5007, you get: 911! How didn&#8217;t we see this sooner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) by Nicholas Cote</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/tv-characters-i-would-most-like-to-date-part-ii/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Cote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-43</guid>
		<description>(A) You really, really, really need to watch The West Wing.

(B) Come now, did you ever really fear for Mrs. Peel&#039;s life?

(C) I will gladly defend Gilmore Girls any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

(D) From now on, I will ignore any mention of the unnamed server of food and drink.

(E) Less than half of those listed in this post are blonde.

(F) Alex Cabot &gt; Serena Southerlyn.  In fact, Alex Cabot &gt; Abbie Carmichael &gt; Claire Kinkaid &gt; Alexandra Borgia &gt; Connie Rubirosa &gt; Jamie Ross &gt; Serena Southerlyn.  Okay, maybe Southerlyn &gt; Ross.  Maybe.  (Good joke about Abbie being liberal, though.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(A) You really, really, really need to watch The West Wing.</p>
<p>(B) Come now, did you ever really fear for Mrs. Peel&#8217;s life?</p>
<p>(C) I will gladly defend Gilmore Girls any day of the week and twice on Sunday.</p>
<p>(D) From now on, I will ignore any mention of the unnamed server of food and drink.</p>
<p>(E) Less than half of those listed in this post are blonde.</p>
<p>(F) Alex Cabot &gt; Serena Southerlyn.  In fact, Alex Cabot &gt; Abbie Carmichael &gt; Claire Kinkaid &gt; Alexandra Borgia &gt; Connie Rubirosa &gt; Jamie Ross &gt; Serena Southerlyn.  Okay, maybe Southerlyn &gt; Ross.  Maybe.  (Good joke about Abbie being liberal, though.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) by JSK</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/tv-characters-i-would-most-like-to-date-part-ii/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>JSK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Sir, you have outdone yourself. A few observations, if you will so allow:

Your entire first section can be stricken from my list, because I&#039;ve never seen any of the shows to which you refer. 

Likewise, your entire second section can be stricken because I believe it to be a sound precept of dating judgment that one should never, under any circumstances, date a spy. The fundamental tenet of any good relationship is trust. Trust built through strong communication. Both trust and communication would be impossible in any spy-dating-relationship because of the restrictions inherent in her work. Plus, she&#039;s bound to be working with handsome, intelligent, dangerous and otherwise perfect male coworkers. You want to compete with that? No thanks.

I will also strike the Gilmore Girls because their characters are abhorrent. If I wanted to never get a word in edgewise again for the rest of my life, I&#039;d sooner date Brescia. At least he&#039;s relatively interesting. 

I&#039;ll note as well that you misspelled &quot;the Waitress&quot; in your Not Without My Daughter category. Dreadful typo there, sir.

This leaves the two legit categories. I won&#039;t go into detail w/each member, but a few highlights and general observations are due. First, you need to break your blond addiction. Life is so much better when you recognize the undeniable truth of brunette superiority. In fact, you note that the most attractive woman on the list is Marta (shame on me for forgetting her for my list, my God what a mistake), who is, indeed, a brunette. Second, let&#039;s not date any witches. First of all, I&#039;d be afraid to ever get into a fight with them - and fights are an inevitable part of any relationship. She could turn you into a jack-in-the-box...then what would you do? No power at all is no way to be in a relationship. Second, witches are by definition demons - practitioners of the dark arts. I think that&#039;s sort of problematic in terms of dating. And Alexandra Cabot? Really? If you&#039;re going to go with a blond, lesbian Law and Order attorney, at least have the good sense to choose Serena Southerland (Elisabeth Rohm) - though may I suggest Angie Harmon&#039;s character instead (might be a tad liberal for your liking, though). 

There are some fine choices here and I eagerly await the final cut. 
And yeah, I know it&#039;s like almost 4am...I&#039;m up studying Corporations, but this is way more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, you have outdone yourself. A few observations, if you will so allow:</p>
<p>Your entire first section can be stricken from my list, because I&#8217;ve never seen any of the shows to which you refer. </p>
<p>Likewise, your entire second section can be stricken because I believe it to be a sound precept of dating judgment that one should never, under any circumstances, date a spy. The fundamental tenet of any good relationship is trust. Trust built through strong communication. Both trust and communication would be impossible in any spy-dating-relationship because of the restrictions inherent in her work. Plus, she&#8217;s bound to be working with handsome, intelligent, dangerous and otherwise perfect male coworkers. You want to compete with that? No thanks.</p>
<p>I will also strike the Gilmore Girls because their characters are abhorrent. If I wanted to never get a word in edgewise again for the rest of my life, I&#8217;d sooner date Brescia. At least he&#8217;s relatively interesting. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll note as well that you misspelled &#8220;the Waitress&#8221; in your Not Without My Daughter category. Dreadful typo there, sir.</p>
<p>This leaves the two legit categories. I won&#8217;t go into detail w/each member, but a few highlights and general observations are due. First, you need to break your blond addiction. Life is so much better when you recognize the undeniable truth of brunette superiority. In fact, you note that the most attractive woman on the list is Marta (shame on me for forgetting her for my list, my God what a mistake), who is, indeed, a brunette. Second, let&#8217;s not date any witches. First of all, I&#8217;d be afraid to ever get into a fight with them &#8211; and fights are an inevitable part of any relationship. She could turn you into a jack-in-the-box&#8230;then what would you do? No power at all is no way to be in a relationship. Second, witches are by definition demons &#8211; practitioners of the dark arts. I think that&#8217;s sort of problematic in terms of dating. And Alexandra Cabot? Really? If you&#8217;re going to go with a blond, lesbian Law and Order attorney, at least have the good sense to choose Serena Southerland (Elisabeth Rohm) &#8211; though may I suggest Angie Harmon&#8217;s character instead (might be a tad liberal for your liking, though). </p>
<p>There are some fine choices here and I eagerly await the final cut.<br />
And yeah, I know it&#8217;s like almost 4am&#8230;I&#8217;m up studying Corporations, but this is way more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Open Letter to Jim Halpert and Pam Beesly by TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) &#171; Nicholas Cote &#124; blog</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/a-open-letter-to-jim-and-pam/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) &#171; Nicholas Cote &#124; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] love Pam?  If I need to elaborate, you&#8217;re in the wrong place.  Cons: I&#8217;ve asked this before, and I&#8217;ll ask it again &#8212; Pam, do you really want to be a receptionist for the rest of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love Pam?  If I need to elaborate, you&#8217;re in the wrong place.  Cons: I&#8217;ve asked this before, and I&#8217;ll ask it again &#8212; Pam, do you really want to be a receptionist for the rest of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bond vs. Bourne, Continued by TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) &#171; Nicholas Cote &#124; blog</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/bond-vs-bourne-continued/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) &#171; Nicholas Cote &#124; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=112#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] case you haven&#8217;t been able to figure this out yet, I love spies (the good ones, anyway).  And so it should be of no surprise that I have many snoops in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case you haven&#8217;t been able to figure this out yet, I love spies (the good ones, anyway).  And so it should be of no surprise that I have many snoops in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part I) by TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) &#171; Nicholas Cote &#124; blog</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/tv-characters-i-would-most-like-to-date-part-i/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part II) &#171; Nicholas Cote &#124; blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments (RSS)       &#171; TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part&#160;I) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments (RSS)       &laquo; TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part&nbsp;I) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TV Characters I Would Most Like to Date (Part I) by JSK</title>
		<link>http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/2008/12/09/tv-characters-i-would-most-like-to-date-part-i/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>JSK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholascote.wordpress.com/?p=128#comment-38</guid>
		<description>OK, first of all to answer your question about the Waitress: &quot;but top ten?&quot;
http://www.lataco.com/taco/wp-content/uploads/1388.jpg
Top-effing-ten. Game, set, and match.

Excellent Squid and Whale quote, and yes, generally, I&#039;d agree that it would be important to talk about films and things. Rita held her own pretty well, though. 

Had I been able to pick Rose as a young girl in St. Olaf, I might have legitimately added her into my top 10. Because Betty White is awesome. 

And as for Mel, exactly. Though, she is more attractive than Anne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, first of all to answer your question about the Waitress: &#8220;but top ten?&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.lataco.com/taco/wp-content/uploads/1388.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.lataco.com/taco/wp-content/uploads/1388.jpg</a><br />
Top-effing-ten. Game, set, and match.</p>
<p>Excellent Squid and Whale quote, and yes, generally, I&#8217;d agree that it would be important to talk about films and things. Rita held her own pretty well, though. </p>
<p>Had I been able to pick Rose as a young girl in St. Olaf, I might have legitimately added her into my top 10. Because Betty White is awesome. </p>
<p>And as for Mel, exactly. Though, she is more attractive than Anne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
